NewCore vs Aembit
Compare the documented agent controls, inspect the differences and verify both products against your own tool-access workflow.
Per-action governance alongside your existing IdP. Short-lived credentials and delegated MCP access.
Limits before strengths
NewCore: Direct CLI tool calls bypass the MCP gateway today. Validate coverage for each agent runtime.
Aembit: A human approval step was not verified in the documentation reviewed.
Criterion-by-criterion delta
| Criterion | NewCore | Aembit | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent identity and ownership | 9.0 | 8.5 | +0.5 |
| Agent discovery | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
| Per-action policy | 9.0 | 8.5 | +0.5 |
| Agent credentials | 8.0 | 9.0 | −1.0 |
| Delegation and on-behalf-of access | 8.0 | 9.0 | −1.0 |
| Audit and lifecycle | 8.5 | 8.0 | +0.5 |
| Human approval | 9.0 | 0.0 | +9.0 |
| MCP gateway and tool control | 9.0 joint | 9.0 joint | 0.0 |
Delta is NewCore minus Aembit. Green is positive; amber is negative. Differences do not establish deployment quality.
Read the evidence
NewCore review
Per-action governance alongside your existing IdP
Official documentation / Verified 2026-11-04
Aembit review
Short-lived credentials and delegated MCP access
Official documentation / Verified 2026-11-04